Categories
Business Digital Technology

Boost Audience Engagement With A Branded “Ask Stack”

A smart “Ask us” experience opens new digital territory for marketers adapting to the same AI that is threatening their content.

Brands, publishers, and media companies are facing an emerging threat: the unauthorized use of content.

Giant tech companies like OpenAI, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google are scraping proprietary messaging from commercial websites and mobile experiences. They are aggregating the unstructured web of words, images, PDFs, audio, and video from web pages, reviews, product lists and detail pages, technical specs, newsletters, learning centers, author bios, and user profiles, and representing it for use by their customers via their large language model applications (LLMs), search results pages, service chat bots, and AI agents.

The practice effectively rebrands your company’s messaging under a new authority established, owned, and managed by the content aggregators.

For publishers that have invested billions of dollars and decades of work into content marketing and audience engagement, the sudden lack of controlled distribution feels like an earthquake. The business impact is comparable to the shift from traditional media to digital in Web 1.0, and from static to dynamic brand engagement in Web 2.0.

The argument against big tech training its AI on commercial content is hazy because most of the source data is public and posted freely. It is actively promoted with the intent of broad consumer consumption.

There is also a precedent for content aggregation and curation without any need for prior authorization. We see this business model everywhere from the Yellow Pages to Yahoo’s web directories to Google’s AMP project, Facebook’s Instant Articles, and Apple News. AI agents like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are arguably on the same spectrum of content collection and dissemination.

However, the speed of this transition and the ensuing market confusion about content validity is putting unplanned pressure on marketers and corporate counsel to reestablish their brand’s relevancy when their work is not being attributed. They suffer financial harm when traffic to their sites falls off a cliff because they lose the opportunity to convert visitors into customers. A cottage industry of law firms are stepping in to defend IP and copyright infringements amid AI solutions that are training upon commercial content without the publisher’s permission.

Where legal constructs often struggle to keep pace with technical innovation, the US Copyright Office is stepping into the fray. Recognizing the speed, precision, and proliferation of AI agents that are training and re-distributing publications without authorization, they are recommending a prompt federal response as a matter of corporate protection and individual privacy.

As conflicts often do, threats to common assumptions expose what we may be taking for granted. An an emerging technology, AI agents are forcing us to confront the distinction between authorship and ownership, and to define the proper degree of attribution.

Despite these legitimate concerns, the underlying market demand for a better digital experience is strong.

Modern consumers, especially younger generations, embrace AI experiences as a superior means of learning and working. Indeed, the threat of AI to the workforce isn’t job replacement as much as it is recognizing that those who leverage AI to their jobs better and faster will outperform their peers.

The “old ways” of searching the web are cumbersome.

Engaging with well-built AI demonstrates the small mindedness of legacy search has been. We needn’t deal with oddball search prompts and having to scan lists of widely variable static results. It’s no longer necessary to click through consent forms and close annoying overlay ads on a destination site just to preview content. We needn’t sacrifice our anonymity and privacy for the knowledge we seek, or at least AI offers the opportunity to reset a clean slate.

On the flip side, companies spend billions of dollars annually on branding and content marketing in owned, earned, and paid media. They’re constantly repositioning to optimize search results to satisfy the elusive algorithms among the platforms that created this mess.

The drumbeat of performance marketing used to sound like this… Build your brand. Generate lots of content. Generate quality content. Amplify in social. Be authentic. Be responsive. Engage. Think like a publisher. Capture, convert, and grow your audience to optimize revenue. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

Seemingly out of nowhere, the same brand managers that have been dutifully producing and publishing content have been caught flat-footed. The proliferation of AI agents are pushing content into places that authors didn’t attend and without attribution.

Consider the modern Google search results experience. This once-familiar web page now resembles a interactive application.

Google search results for how to fix a leaky faucet shows a series of AI agents which I'm labeling an Ask Stack
Figure 1: Google Search Results are built upon AI Overviews & More by Google Labs project that resembles more of an interactive application than a web page.

In Figure 1, the search results are a fraction of the page’s real estate. The source links (circled in red) no longer surface the source name. Instead, the tiny images burden the user to identify these visual markers and then manually engage with them via mouseover and click-throughs to see the source content.

Moving below the fold, Page 1 results are structured to retain traffic within the Google ecosystem. Visitors see video links to YouTube (owned by Google), a new “People also ask” section with more search prompts displayed in two separate blocks, discussions and forums that are heavily weighted toward Reddit, and sponsored results.

Following last year’s updates to the Google algorithm, all of the commercial investment in content and performance is pushed deeper into Google’s search results. In turn, companies must allocate budget paid ads and video content to maintain their visible relevance on the search results landing page.

What is an “Ask Stack” and how can it help marketers reach their audiences?

An Ask Stack is a collection of AI agents assembled in place of a traditional web page like onsite search results. It is designed to engage site visitors in a more immersive interactive experience, and can be utilized to assist visitors with needs beyond the brand’s reach.

Here is an example of Ask Stack.

Imagine you visit your favorite automotive brand. As a recent new owner of a Polestar, I’ll use their site as a visual example.

Example of an Ask Stack for Polestar.com

Instead of the annoying chat bot that pops up on the bottom-right screen (which Polestar mercifully suppresses), imagine a subtle visual cue in the site’s search icon up in the global navigation that triggers a mega-menu.

Within the mega-menu is an embedded application and a search field cycling through a series of creative prompts that invite engagement.

For example:

  • Show me Polestar dealers nearby
  • Show me a model comparison between Polestar and similar electric vehicles
  • Help me price a vehicle within a budget of $40,000 including taxes, title, and licensing in Texas.
  • How does Polestar rate among Uber and Door Dash delivery drivers?
  • How do I make the switch to a fully electric car?
  • Where can I find the best auto insurance rates?
  • Map a route from my home in Austin to the Crescent hotel in Dallas with super fast charging stations, a pitstop at Buc-cee’s and that bakery in Waco that sells cherry ice box cookies. Include weather and traffic reports, and tell me what time I need to leave in order to arrive by 4:00 pm.
  • Show me a complete and healthy meal plan each evening this week and box lunches for the kids. Attach a shopping list ordered by the main grocery sections. (I like to charge my Polestar at my local HEB, so the two brands are interlinked in my mind.)

You get the idea… The level of user engagement is endless.

The genius of this approach is that it doesn’t presume. Visitors are free to approach your brand on their terms. Even prompts that grate against traditional notions of sales and marketing (e.g. competitive comparisons or asking for an unfavorable safety rating) are still being conducted within the authority of the brand as a convenient courtesy to the consumer.

Where branding is fundamentally an act of trust-building, companies that truly value transparency and actively engage their consumer base are best suited to adopt an Ask Stack strategy.

How should marketers develop and pitch an Ask Stack to their leadership?

Recognize that your content is valuable!

You’ve invested heavily in your content to attract audiences and set your company apart from the field. Your content is an important business asset and it’s ripe for leverage among AI agents. That leverage needs to be on your terms.

Quantify the value of your content marketing program. (If you need help doing this, ask your favorite AI to assist!) Here are the typical budget categories and percentage of spend that I see among my agency clients:

  1. Content Creation (30-50%): This includes writing, designing, video production, and other creative services required to produce blogs, social media posts, whitepapers, videos, infographics, etc.
  2. Distribution and Promotion (20-30%): This includes channels like paid ads in social media and search engines, syndication, and paid partnerships.
  3. Technology and Tools (10-20%): This includes CMS licensing and managed services, organic, technical SEO, analytics, email marketing, and tools used for creation and performance marketing.
  4. Personnel and Agency Fees (15-25%): This includes variable fees for agencies and freelancers independent of fixed operational costs (internal producers) and capital expenditures (CMS design, build, integration, program development).
  5. Research & Planning (5-10%): This includes costs to inform content strategies e.g. audience engagement, keyword research, competitive analysis, and consultation.

These categories and percentages vary based on your business goals, content maturity, and target audience. They reveal investment concentration for spend alignment and optimization.

Tighten up your understanding of assistive vs agentive vs agentic AI language.

Christopher Noessel published an outstanding primer with visuals to help you understand the evolving relationship between humans and machines that merits important distinctions. Properly articulating the need will help you make a business case and communicate with your designers and engineers.

Google’s AI Principles are a set of philosophical core values about how the company intends to use AI. You can weave these into a forward-looking pitch, although they’re as nebulous as the company’s original “Do no evil” mantra. They lack commercial application and don’t speak to fair use of published content.

Monetize your content.

Dappier (short for data happier) helps companies monetize their content with permissions-based training of AI agents and LLMs.

I recently met with Dappier CEO Dan Goikhman [LinkedIn] for coffee to discuss his approach to the large-scale problem facing brand managers and publishers. His company helps brands monetize their content directly (via their marketplace) and indirectly (via a collection of AI agents / Ask Stack).

The direct path to monetization is straightforward. Dappier maintains an AI marketplace of firms willing to pay to train their LLMs and AI agents on your commercial content.

The Dappier Marketplace resembles a familiar consumption-based payment model (similar to SEM marketplaces) with pay-per-query bidding.

This is the direction large media companies and publishers are headed as they struggle to optimize revenue in common channels like advertising, sponsorships, subscriptions, memberships, events, and affiliate programs. You can follow all of OpenAI’s partner deals. My former employer Automattic (parent company of Tumblr and WordPress.com) is rumored to be negotiating with OpenAI and Midjourney to train on their 100s of millions of webpages.

I’d recommend evaluating direct monetization for…

  • companies with large volumes of content (1000s of individual webpages)
  • companies undertaking an AI Readiness assessment
  • companies invested in a consumer data platform (CDPs)
  • companies with a master data management plan (MDM)
  • companies with a firm grasp of their digital strategy during this period of rapid transformation

The indirect path to monetization is a brilliantly-conceived Ask Stack experience.

This is how Dappier works: they take your branded content and pre-train it for use by LLMs and natural language APIs via RAG models (retrieval augmented generation). RAG models are AI frameworks that provide a much deeper engagement experience than a traditional LLM that may be out of date or lacking context like product data and the history of an existing client relationship.

Plainly speaking, Dappier combines your branded content with your customer data (e.g. emails, chat logs, and social media posts) with content from premium providers in news, weather, sports, and finance.

This aggregated data set allows your to build a highly engaging ask-your-brand experience. You can deliver a factually accurate and highly relevant experience to your audiences in real time.

Invest in Reddit content and community engagement to optimize SEO.

Reddit content is a major component of the Google search results example in Figure 1 with prominent links back to the forum. This presents a good opportunity for clever marketers to surface their content in an organic manner within Google’s Ask Stack.

Supercell, the parent company of popular gaming titles Clash Royale and Clash of Clans, publishes their news and support content to branded subreddits. They redirect users to their Reddit posts with active moderation and participation by community leaders.

Keep in mind, Redditors are notoriously skeptical of sponsored content. Gaming studio EA holds the title for the most downvoted comment in Reddit history for its cavalier response to a customer complaint (“The intent is to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment for unlocking different heroes.” has -668k downvotes as of this writing).

Study Reddit use cases to ensure it’s the right venue for your content strategy. Follow the basic tenets of social marketing… Know your audience. Be authentic. Tailor your voice.

Convert corporate communications to storytelling platforms that seed AI agents.

When building your Ask Stack, don’t forget to include corporate communications generated by press relations, analyst relations, and investor relations.

Where this branded content is often sanitized B2B messaging, it’s a strong source for AI training and consumer reach via conversational agents. As web- and mobile-ready composable content, these materials can be repackaged as high-impact experiences that complement your AI strategy.

Here are some in-market examples of various types of branded newsrooms in which I’m affiliated and can answer questions:

Starbucks
https://stories.starbucks.com includes a tight integration of news and product announcements with consumer-facing interests around coffee house culture, coffee sourcing, in-store music, and employee bios.

VMware
https://news.vmware.com has case studies, press releases & podcasts.

T-Mobile
https://www.t-mobile.com/news is a branded mobile newsroom.

Salesforce
The brand’s unique personality and voice are captured in two content platforms https://salesforce.com/news and https://salesforce.com/blog

Uber
https://uber.com/blog and https://uber.com/newsroom split a global network of publishers into multiple languages.

Hilton
https://stories.hilton.com aggregates distinct brands into a single storytelling news center.

Each of these examples are headless WordPress frameworks that support rich multimedia content and story layouts, press and media kits, leadership biographies, localized editions, advanced search, custom editorial permissions, support for single sign-on integration (SAML), and essential integrations like email marketing signup. All of these corporate communications can be rolled into an Ask Stack while functioning as separate browsable experiences.

Let citizen experiences in the public sector inspire your branded Ask Stack.

My work as Head of Partnerships at 10up has led me to explore emerging AI tech at AWS and GTS a unique firm designing and building citizen portals for federal, state, and local agencies.

GTS has a suite of offerings built on top of AWS tools like Amazon Connect, Bedrock, Lex, S3, and EC2. Browse GTS case studies to see how properly funded projects can be deployed.

A final word of caution about over-reliance on a branded AI.

This summer my daughter Mary (with whom I am still wrapped around her finger) transferred to Texas A&M University (which is really weird as I’m a proud Longhorn).

We had a positive experience engaging with an AI agent named Liam at Northpoint Crossing, a large student housing development backed by Ares Management Corporation.

Liam helped answer some questions about available floor plans, pricing, amenities, and scheduling a tour scheduling at Northpoint Crossing. When we called the property, Liam answered the phone with a voice of inflection that sounded so human, I asked him, “Are you a human?” Incredibly, Liam helped us locate one of the terms buried in an addendum of our rental agreement.

Unfortunately Liam is limited beyond the scope of the residential property. It cannot provide any information about the university, the Northgate neighborhood in which it’s built, or even the retail shops on the property. It’s missing a lot of helpful information to prospective renters, residents, and their parents let alone partnerships with nearby businesses seeking to reach their young adult audience.

My word of caution is to balance your Ask Stack with a real human connection. Consumer reviews of Northpoint Crossing are absolutely terrible (contrary to Mary’s lived experience there) and negatively influenced our purchase decision. Predictably, the common thread among all the complaints is not being able to reach someone that can help them when Liam couldn’t.

Don’t be that kind of brand. Make it easy for people to buy!

I can help you design and build a branded Ask Stack!

I’m happy to help you develop this digital strategy for your brand. Let’s connect!

Feature image is from Ana Municio on Unsplash

Categories
Advertising Buzz Social Media

Courting Brand Evangelists to Twitter

Update: Read the comments to learn how to win a free cruise. I believe this is the first #freecruise contest held exclusively on Twitter.

Case Study: Effective Online PR by Travel Brands

Working at GSD&M, I got to see some of the cool interactive and broadcast work we did for Norwegian Cruise Line. The creative campaign translates well across print, outdoor & direct and the TV spots have been well-received.

Norwegian Cruise Line   Norwegian Cruise Line   Norwegian Cruise Line

In the social space, Carnival has cruised to the front of the Twitter line. They have a brand evangelist, @CruiseSource, tweeting live from a Carnival cruise that is currently underway. His current bio reads “Your Source for Everything related to Cruising. Live from CCL Destiny 10.16.08.”

CruiseSource.us is a blog about cruising, not Carnival persay. My clients in the travel industry tell me that they enjoy perks from cruise lines and destination resorts in exchange for bookings and promotion. Presumably, that arrangement exists for CruiseSource, and it’s a good way for Carnival to dip their toe in the social ocean.

What is notable about this case is how effectively brand evangelists utilize micromedia to generate buzz and online PR for brands. This is also a good example of small businesses being nimble with social strategy and engagement.

Best Practices in Social Media Strategy & Engagement

CruiseSource is using Twitter to establish themselves as experts in their niche. Rather than just constantly link back to their site, an early mistake they seem to have overcome, they relate with their audience in meaningful ways. Examples:

Apparently their efforts have led a major cruise line to invite CruiseSource to participate on a web 2.0 advisory board. If this is Carnival, then kudos for building a smart partnership and generating inexpensive online PR. As long as CruiseSource maintains an air of industry promotion and authentic human interaction, Carnival will benefit from the company’s peer recommendations.

For any travel brand, I suggest a few more tips in establishing a genuine social presence online.

I’m interested to see what travel brands develop on other social platforms, both in external marketing and within the company’s internal organization of staff, partners and sales channels.

Categories
Advertising Buzz Project Management Social Media

Reaching Friends In a Crowded Twitter Room

Deconstructing Personal Twitter Feeds to Help Communication

Without being privy to formal Twitter usability studies, I’d wager most people rarely browse their tweet timeline beyond the first page. For those of us who follow hundreds and thousands of tweeters, we miss the vast majority of tweets in our network. It also means that only the most frequent tweeters have a chance of being heard by their followers.

How to hear your friends on Twitter

How to Subscribe to individual Twitter RSS feedsWhen I’m in a consumer mode, I often click on individual tweeters to read their last series of posts. I gravitate toward different people depending on what mood/topic I’m interested in at the time.

My friend who is new to Twitter asks, “How can I push my friend’s tweets to me?” Easy. Scroll to the bottom of a profile and subscribe to the RSS feed. You will see their tweets in your reader.

You may have select tweeters of whom you’d like to read everything they say, so subscribe to their RSS feeds. Note, when someone deletes a tweet from their timeline, it still appears in their RSS feed like Google Reader or Facebook. People in this category might include:

  • News feeds
  • Family & close friends
  • Thought leaders, trend watchers
  • Twitter HR: Coworkers, staff, employees, applicants
  • Prospective tenants
  • Online reputation management
  • Legal forensics
  • Private accounts for project collaboration
  • Companies, products, sports teams, celebrities
  • Others? Leave a comment below!

How to be heard by your friends on Twitter

Use @name replies so tweets about them will show up in their Replies list. I’ve found people tend to favorite these tweets more often (I do too) and people are more apt to reply back. Be sure to put the @reply at the beginning of your tweet, otherwise it will not appear in their Replies list (Twitter should fix this).

I also direct message (DM) people with increasing frequency. By default, Twitter sends them an email to their preferred email account and it lands in their Direct Messages queue. Good uses for @replies and DMs are:

  • Expressing appreciation for new follows
  • Conventions, tweet-ups
  • To make an introduction
  • Apply for jobs w/ Twitter-savvy recruiters like @kimhaynes
  • Ping a friend’s mobile device (also use the Nudge feature)
  • Quick & pithy emails
  • Top of mind awareness
  • Lead generation

Is this helpful? Please talk back with a comment or tweet me with an @reply or DM 🙂

Categories
Advertising Social Media

How to Alienate Online Customers

Tips on How to Destroy Your Online Brand

Seth Godin and Ed Welch have 101 ideas for brand managers on how not to take care of their customers. Here are my favorites related to online advertising.

  • 3. Don’t ask for feedback from your customers. Make them take surveys but never engage them in a conversation with you.
  • 5. Do everything you can to keep your customers from creating a community – you don’t want them talking to each other.
  • 15. Don’t take viral marketing seriously. How fast can a message spread anyway?
  • 22. Never try to build customer evangelists – mass advertising has always worked better!
  • 31. Routinely email your customers without their expressed permission. The more frequently you send email, the better.
  • 42. Don’t browse the internet – don’t look for what people are saying about your company.
  • 69. Be sure you understand that internet marketing is just like “old school marketing”.

Read the whole list: 101 Ways to Destroy Your Tribe

Categories
Advertising Buzz Social Media

HBOlab Explores Social Media

Experimental Programming Benefits the HBO Brand

Hooking UpHBO is experimenting with media convergence through it’s HBOlab unit in a new web series, Hooking Up. Set in a fictional college named Bask U, the show features popular video bloggers and web celebrities. HBOlab will release the show exclusively through online video venues.

Hooking Up features web celebrities who have managed to garner millions of online fans over the past few years.
 

The series would emphasize content and experience over relatively low production costs, something HBO has been willing to try in the past with Project Greenlight and K Street. Both of these pseudo documentaries also leveraged star-status to help generate buzz. I expect Hooking Up will attract more visibility given advances in social media platforms and a broader reach of online video delivery.

The show’s best shot at success is each star’s ability to self promote directly to their own massive fanbases online. The sense of being approachable lends a web celebrity a distinct advantage over the contests and film stars used in previous HBO projects. Moreover, the current fanbase is already in place and quite active.

Fortunately, it sounds like the project’s success will not be measured simply on it’s ability to turn a profit, rather HBOlabs appears to have freedom to really play in the social space. Following my experience on the BMW Ramp mockumentary, I anticipate a few benefits for HBO despite the low entry costs:

  • Devoted Fans
    Behind-the-scenes commentaries & extra content can turn causal consumers into devoted fans, especially when a company engages them directly. Consumers that become personally invested with the stars and each other can become powerful WOM channels. Dwights Blog, Ron Moore’s Battlestar Galactica podcast and multiple Lost Podcasts are good examples.
  • New Audiences
    HBO has an opportunity to develop new online communities around shows, storylines and set locations. They can also attract audiences from niche communities and convert them to devoted fans.
  • New Real Estate
    HBO has an opportunity to develop new web properties with which sponsors will want to associate their own brands.
  • New Talent
    HBOlabs can develop production and creative talent into other projects at HBO. Shows & talent can cross pollinate to generate more buzz and attract fresh audiences. We realize similar benefits at SQPN.
  • Generate Buzz
    Free PR outlets like fans, evangelists, thought leaders and the business press help refresh HBO’s top of mind awareness and new paid subscriptions.
  • Smart Positioning
    Companies that invest in social media are currently perceived as youthful, approachable and technically savvy.

HBOlab is already gaining popularity with Runawaybox, an interactive brand spanning multiple domains, including a behind-the-scenes blog, MySpace and multiple Youtube channels.

Hooking Up is written and directed by Sherwood “Woody” Tondrof, part of the creative talent behind “The BC“, a 2005-2006 web series spoof on Fox’s “The OC.” The BC tells the story of a troubled Boston College student who meets a kindly Jesuit priest. The show is fiction, but it effectively uses real BC students and professors and garnered national attention through a mixture of traditional and online guerrilla marketing.

Categories
Advertising Social Media

How to Strengthen Your Online Community

This exercise is for Social & Community Managers seeking to start, build and grow their online communities.

Be sure to read the Online Community Lifecycle first!

Stage 1: Forming

Reflection: Online Community Formation
Group Dynamics: Forming

You probably have a good idea about how you’d like to steer the early stages of your web community. Ponder these questions to see if you’re on track and where you might adjust.

What is the goal of your group expressed in a single sentence? What objectives serve that goal?
 

Have you defined how your community will operate? Have you published forum rules or comment guidelines? Do you have a privacy policy? Do you have a plan for dealing with spam, trolls and other abusive elements?

Will you allow members to self-promote in early stages? Will your leaders and mods be able to distinguish between natural self-promotion and spam posts?

What attributes reveal your management style? Approachable? Hands off?

Which best describes your approach in forming your group?
    » Ready. Aim. Fire.
    » Ready. Fire. Aim.
    » Ready. Aim. Aim. Aim. Aim.

Who do you know that counterbalances your style and approach? How can they help?

Are you participating in your community? What are you doing to foster group participation? What are you doing that inhibits participation?

Who is emerging as a potential leader in your community? Are there any brand evangelists? Consistent contributors? Natural mediators? Do they get along well with others?

Stage 2: Storming

Reflection: Online Community Growth
Group Dynamics: Storming

As your community vision extends to others, you inherently sacrifice messaging control. Learn from the mistakes of others, and look at the many brands handling this change successfully. Read these questions to help articulate new and persistent problems and suggest possible actions you can take.

Do new ideas serve the group’s goal? Do these ideas need to be abandoned? Or should they be drafted within a new set of objectives?
 

How do you welcome new members to your community? What would a new member experience when they join your group?

Do you have infighting among members of your group? Is it healthy debate or destructive bomb-throwing?

Do you have a Troll Watch List? How will you deal with troublemakers? Which is an appropriate course of action: a public rebuke? A gentle reminder of the rules? Or do you cut to the bone and ban them from the community?

Do you have arguments spilling over from other communities on the Internet? Can you find resolution from past history? Do you accept personality clashes as inevitable?

Do “know-it-alls” squash discussion? Are they truly knowledgeable, but lack interpersonal soft skills? Can you help them add value without pissing everyone off? Or are they just jerks? Can you call in support from senior members to chastise, clarify, defend or attack?

How do you oversee member contributions? Are avatars offensive? Are you overrun with spam or offensive material? Do you invite self-policing or do you have a team of responders actively patrolling for issues or both? Do you have clear path to moderators so members can notify you of problems? Are you aware of technologies that can help you control unwanted and malicious material?

Do you have strong diplomats that value peacekeeping over healthy debate and disagreement? Are they allowing an argument enough time to play itself out? Do they send fighters to their corners too quickly?

How is your leadership personality? Can you be a bit overbearing or needy at times? Too timid? How do you respond to the ideas of others? Do you have a “brain trust” that can give you honest feedback of your performance?

Stage 3: Norming

Reflection: Habit & Tone in Your Online Community
Group Dynamics: Norming

As your community matures, you will recognize healthy attachment among its members. Your community may operate fine in this stage with minor maintenance and attention. Or you might want to tighten cooperation and press for higher performance.

What is your group’s current dynamic? Is it collaborative? Combative? Active or passive?
 

Can you identify sub-groups within your community? Which are good, bad or ambiguous to your goals & objectives?

Do you have any individuals that tend to cut across cliques or rise above the fray? Might they become leaders, moderators or brand evangelists for you?

What tools and methods can every member hook into? What areas need stronger collaboration?

What good habits does your group have? How can you foster them?

What bad habits does your group have? What actions or lack of action leads to those habits? What attitudes, beliefs and past “baggage” contribute to those ongoing actions?

What ideas and practices are deeply ingrained in your community? Do they really serve the purpose? Can you identify any that are harmful or inhibit performance? Are you part of the echo chamber or do you have enough distance to recognize it?

Are you transitioning from a role of director to a role of working supervisor? Are others assuming roles of leadership?

Do you need to return to a new Forming or Storming stage to shake up your community? Who can you recruit to help?

Stage 4: Performing

Reflection: Sustaining High Performance
Group Dynamics: Performing

Congratulations if your community has achieved a level of high performance. Take some time to think about how you can keep it going.

Is your community financially solvent? Is it monetized via ad revenue or paid content?
 

Is your software keeping pace with your level of community activity?

Which social networks target your membership demographic or psychographic? Where else do your members hang out? Can you forge mutually beneficial partnerships?

Can use social media networks and user generated content platforms to expand services to existing members? Can you use these tools to boost membership?

Can you leverage Ning’s “viral expansion loop” to accelerate growth?

What tactics do you see working in other high performing communities?

Post Mortem: Transforming and Mourning

Reflection: Changes and Death of an Online Community
Your community may be on the verge of temporary or permanent transition. Consider these issues to decide if you should embrace change or pull the plug.

Has your group achieved its goal? Are people wondering “what’s next?”
 

Have key influencers or core leaders left the group?

Are you facing burnout? Do you have time to continue leading?

Are you stuck in a perpetual Storming stage? Would it make sense to transition back to Forming or press on to Norming?

Who could potentially take over community management? Is there a stand-out leader or sub-group?

Is your advertising campaign approaching EOL? Is the community still flourishing? Do long-tail benefits justify continued community support, even without actively promoting it?

How can your community celebrate its accomplishments? Who deserves acknowledgment?

Final Thoughts

Community Managers that want to work on their community, and less time in it should study Tucker’s model of group dynamics in the context of a Social Community Lifecycle.

Categories
Advertising Project Management Social Media

The Online Community Lifecycle

Group Dynamics 101 for Online Community Managers

Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing

A couple years ago I took a 10-month leadership course on small group facilitation to learn about how new groups form and achieve sustainability. The lessons were geared for physical offline groups, but my experience as an online group facilitator, including one of the largest social networks on Ning, convinces me that offline group models remain intact in the realm of social media as well. Web communities are comprised of real people, so we can expect basic human behavior patterns to permeate regardless of the medium in which they communicate.

The Online Community Lifecycle

In 1965, Bruce Tucker proposed a model of group dynamics popularly known as Forming, Storming, Norming & Performing. In a nutshell, Tucker’s model encompasses several distinct stages, beginning from a group’s creation through its maturation and ultimate evolution or extinction.

Online community managers will find that Tucker’s work is still relevant today. These same stages of creation and growth are evident within all types of social media. If you moderate blog comments, forum posts, product reviews, news feedback, podcast networks or participate in social gaming or virtual worlds, Tucker’s model should be of interest to you. This is especially useful if you want insight into how your community can achieve sustainability.

The Lifecycle of Online Communities

Let’s look at each stage in sequence and consider how Tucker’s model applies to today’s online groups. As you read the descriptions, try to identify within which stage your online community currently exists. Is your community flourishing? Do you need to shift your community toward a later stage? Or retreat to an earlier one?

Update: I posted a series of reflection questions for each stage of the lifecycle.

Stage 1: Forming

The Group Is Born

In the early stages of group development, individuals rally behind a leader or core steering committee under a banner of broad challenge or opportunity. Enthusiasm is high, friendships form easily and people begin working on tasks. Everyone tends to be on their best behavior, but founding members operate independently with sense of autonomy and tend to be self-focused.

Group Dynamics: FormingSuccessful groups leaders claim a position of authority by virtue of their experience, maturity, availability or simply because they are the ones laying the ground rules. Leaders frame guidelines on how the group will function and how its members will interrelate. This may be expressly written or socially implied through mission statements, codes of conduct and “leading by example.” Sharing the principles of group dynamics among group leaders and moderators can be very helpful in preparing people to encounter situations. (wink wink nudge nudge: share this article with your social media managers…)

In the Forming stage, group leaders should also watch for early emerging leaders. When I instructed ROTC cadets in various drill camps and leadership schools, we closely observed individuals in order to fill positions as squad leaders and flight commanders within the first few hours of training. Extroverts tend to rise because they naturally make themselves known to others, but introverts are just as capable of leading if they are prompted or invited to do so.

Reflection: Online Community Formation
You probably have a good idea about how you’d like to steer the early stages of your web community. Read these questions to see if you’re on track and where you might adjust.

Stage 2: Storming

Ideas and Personalities Compete to Be Heard

Every group encounters a period of identity & self awareness, where members debate essential objectives and problems and how they should behave individually and within groups. This is also a stage where leadership authority, knowledge, style and capability is most apt to be judged as either appropriate or unsatisfactory.

Group Dynamics: StormingGroups can pass quickly through this stage or they can collapse for a number of reasons. If a leader abdicates their early role as guide, role model and referee, then stronger personalities are poised to set the behavioral tone. If purpose and objectives are muddled, then people will argue or undermine others to prove that their ideas are superior. “Good” people that were initially motivated, engaged and participating will leave the group.

Another common community “soul killer” is the mouthy member that cannot help themselves from yapping. You know these people. They speak too often, for too long, and usually about issues that are irrelevant and self-serving. They overemphasize the minutia and obfuscate meaningful issues. They can make others uncomfortable by being too personal or act insensitively to others. They are not invited to speak by others, rather they tend to chime in on everything to imply deep personal wisdom, even if they just want to point out that they have no opinion on the matter. They moan, whine and grind their opponents. At the same time, these people can be overly welcoming and kind to new group members in an effort to win them to their side. Their immaturity is so evident, one is surprised to learn they aren’t a teenager (perhaps they are in netiquette terms).

If group leaders do not want to lose control of their group at such a critical stage, they need to act decisively to stifling, filibustering and flame wars. A good community manager brings a big bag of tricks with tactics in nuance, creativity, subtly and force. Like a good parent, group facilitators need to be ready to discipline, lead and teach. By applying a little parental love to your community, you can present an example of nurturing behavior amid disagreement and discord and move quickly past an otherwise painful growth spurt.

Reflection: Online Community Growth
As your community vision extends to others, you inherently sacrifice messaging control. Learn from the mistakes of others, and look at the many brands handling this change successfully. Read these questions to help articulate new and persistent problems and suggest possible actions you can take.

Stage 3: Norming

Purpose, Cliques & Team Habits Form
Groups that reach the Norming stage enjoy clarity about their goals and objectives. That clarity helps to draw its members into service of the group, so harsh infighting and sabotage tends to fall away before this stage.

Group Dynamics: NormingIndividuals promote themselves less, unless the group’s objective involves self-promotion like business networks, alliances and chambers of commerce. Even then, members support each other through introductions into spheres of influence beyond the group.

Members in this phase naturally attach to sub-groups of similar interests and tasks. Teamwork is stronger within sub-groups and sub-groups work more seamlessly with each other. Trust is built as people get to know each other and as the group accomplishes objectives. Collaboration is built through agreement on rules and the sharing of methods and tools.

Groupthink is a hazardous risk in the Norming stage, where new ideas and creativity are stifled in favor of process and status quo. Community leaders need to caution against group denial and echo chambers by recognizing their symptoms. They can avoid groupthink by remaining neutral and inviting fresh POVs when appropriate.

Hierarchy tends to flatten out during Norming compared to earlier stages. With a clear mission, collaboration and interpersonal issues worked out, leaders are able to assume more production tasks. Conversely, team leads may be established with more authority and control passed down and shared from Forming and Storming managers.

Reflection: Habit & Tone in Your Online Community
As your community matures, you will recognize healthy attachment among its members. Your community may operate fine in this stage with minor maintenance and attention. Or you might want to tighten cooperation and press for higher performance. Reflect on your community to see where it is healthy and where it needs attention.

Stage 4: Performing

Teamwork & Efficiency Prevail

A few groups will achieve the Performing stage where everyone seems to be firing on all pistons. Milestones are accomplished and objectives are routinely met. Experience is high, so communities become a rich knowledge base.

Group Dynamics: PerformingTeams become interdependent and work together fluidly without the drama borne from unnecessary conflict. Dissent does exist as long as it is channeled in a manner that is acceptable to the group. Supervision is minimal as people are held accountable to each other. Decision-making resembles more of a populist democracy than a dictatorship or republic. Community leaders tend to be highly participative.

High performing teams may face circumstances that thrust themselves back to early stages. For example, the void left when early leaders leave a community can trigger a new Storming phase. I’m also reminded of the downtime caused by an explosion in the Planet’s H1 data center in Houston, an experience that sent its support forums into overdrive. Communities can experience these cycles of life over and over.

Browse the Big Boards to get a sense of what some of the largest communities on the web are doing. This is an outstanding resource for guerrilla social marketing.

Reflection: Sustaining High Performance
Congratulations if your community has achieved a level of high performance. Take some time to think about how you can keep it going.

Post Mortem: Transforming and Mourning

Dealing with Change and Coping with Demise

Online communities are like living organisms that either adapt to internal and external changes or they will die. Think back to the big events in your life and they were almost always precipitated by change. Leaving home, starting school, starting a career, leaving a job, getting married and having kids all involve a death of sorts. One ceases to act or exist in one way when they change in another way. The same kind of death and renewal applies to groups.

I have seen leaders “kill” online communities and the reaction is not unlike real-world death. Feelings may not be as severe as losing a loved one, but members do experience a sense of loss like seeing your favorite TV show get canceled or saying goodbye to a friend that move’s away. This experience in virtual communities is not surprising considering the personal investment and real formation of human bonds.

Brand managers should consider this effect when transitioning campaigns or taking down social microsites at the end of a media flight (aka End of Life or EOL). If maintenance costs are truly inhibitive to effective ongoing community support, then the community should probably be taken offline. A diseased community can actually be harmful to a brand.

On the other hand, if long-tail benefits are evident and the group is operating at a strong Norming or weak Performing stage, the community may merit a plan for transition and ongoing maintenance, even if it only provides minimal support.

If you decide to maintain a community because participation and impressions justify the cost, then turn to your vendor partners for help in this transition. Good providers like Mango Mobile plan for EOL at the beginning of a campaigns. They are very flexible in either extending maintenance agreements or handing all assets back to the client for perpetual hosting. Another example is Blockdot in the advergaming space. They continue to support several widgets, social gaming and community applications well beyond the original EOL campaign schedule.

The life and energy of a social network benefits from early planning in the Online Community Lifecycle. Likewise, it benefits from planning at the end of life. Leaders can use Transforming and Mourning stages as an opportunity to publicly praise the group’s accomplishments. Individuals can be recognized, relationships can be acknowledged and achievements can be praised. People celebrate the birth of children and they gather to celebrate the life of those departed in death. The same kind of celebration can be introduced to the life and achievements of an online community.

Reflection: Changes and Death of an Online Community
Your community may be on the verge of temporary or permanent transition. Consider these issues to decide if you should change or pull the plug.

Final Thoughts

Community Managers that want to work on their community, and less time in it should study Tucker’s model of group dynamics in the context of an Online Community Lifecycle. Just as a sapling needs light, nutrients, water and fresh soil, an online community can be groomed for healthy sustainable growth.

Update: Read the accompanying article, How to Strengthen Your Online Community

Categories
Advertising Social Media

Clark Howard Is Growing Up

While writing about the Online Community Lifecycle, I recalled an episode I observed years ago during the “storming” phase of the Clark Howard Message Boards. I remember one particular real estate expert who was an absolute tyrant in the community. This guy knew his field extremely well, but he had zero patience for real estate noobs and those with whom he disagreed. He offered world-class advise, but would turn on a dime into a crass name-calling bully. For the life of me, the only reason I can fathom that Clark allowed this to persist is because he is a notoriously self-admitted cheapskate that didn’t invest in proper tools and personnel to sustain a vibrant community. Unfortunately, Clark allowed his community to fester and attack each other relentlessly, and were it not for his very popular radio show and books, it surely would have failed.

I found this member’s disposition to be quite amusing in spite of the anguish he caused. He really did know his stuff, even though his tough-love modus operandi ruffled feathers. I joined the group and started a new topic entitled “Ode to [whatever is name was].” I wrote a simple sonnet a la the meter of “There once was a man from Nantucket” about this particular individual.

In an amusing and respectful way, I essentially pointed out how smart this guy was. People needed to look past his curmudgeon persona and listen to the genuine knowledge he had to offer.

The response was very positive given that it was so personal. People came forward to give the guy the credit he deserved, yet inviting him to chill out. He appreciated the gesture, other lurkers came out of the shadows and several people even wrote their own poems; very funny in a stale financial forum.

Unfortunately, Clark’s moderator got wind of the thread and, incredibly, removed it because it didn’t meet some strict (and secret) rule about never ever under any circumstances deviating from financial discussions. Shortly thereafter and ever since, newcomers are assaulted with the glaring red warning to behave and to watch out for unscrupulous behavior, negative messaging that is sure to drive them straight to the shadows of Lurker Land.

The moderator’s decision was a real shame because we had planted a fun seed of comradeship and goodwill amid a well-intentioned community. Moreover, this online brand was desperately struggling to find a kind voice that welcomed new members. It’s remarkable because if you spend 2 minutes listening to Clark, you’ll hear a very gentle and humorous tone that was in stark contrast to the vitriol people encountered on his website at that time. I think the moderator’s seemingly hip-shot decision to stamp out any fun was a serious mistake for another reason as well: Community leaders should never forget that people are actually investing themselves when they contribute content. This investment strengthens a community and develops brand evangelists. And converting lurkers to active participants should always be nurtured whenever possible.

Thankfully, Clark seems to have learned some important lessons. His team has a presence on the boards and applies more consistent moderation. New visitors can see clearly demarcated subject matters to consume content relevant to them.

Clark also does an excellent job of directing his radio listeners to his website during his “Trash Clark” segment where he invites people to log on and leave feedback in his “Clark Stinks” forum. This strategy accomplishes two key objectives simultaneously. (Note: I hesitate to say “strategy” because I believe Clark’s success is in large part because he has a true servant’s heart. He cares deeply about his listeners.) First, by promoting his message boards, he is encouraging people to participate beyond listening and lurking. I’d wager his website enjoys long length-of-stays and very low bounce rates. It’s prime real estate for his radio advertisers which presumably could generate more revenue for some technology improvements.

Second, Clark provides a vehicle for people to give him direct public feedback, which amplifies his nice-guy approachable image. Few people actually bash Clark, but his gesture is very smart.

While part of this online community feels as though it’s clinging to adolescence, at least it has matured beyond puberty. Clark’s radio convergence and enthusiastic team shows signs of even greater potential.